Rules match formats
Why Do Female Tennis Players Only Play 3 Sets? The Best-of-5 Debate at the Grand Slams
At the Grand Slams men play best of five sets and women best of three, even though both are paid the same. The reasons are mostly history and scheduling. Women did play five-set finals, from 1984 to 1998, and in 2026 the idea came back.
- Women at the Slams
- 3sets at most, two to win
- Men at the Slams
- 5sets at most, three to win
- Five-set women's finals
- 15years, 1984 to 1998
Photo: Nuță Lucian from Cluj-Napoca, Romania, CC BY-SA 2.0, cropped, via Wikimedia Commons
Formats
Best of 3 vs best of 5 at the Grand Slams
In shortAt the four Grand Slams men play best of five sets, so a player needs three sets to win; women play best of three and need two. At every other professional event both tours play best of three.
Best of
3
- Sets to win
- 2
- Fewest games to win
- 12
- Fewest points to win
- 48
- Most sets, with tiebreaks
- 3 sets, 39 games
- Who plays it
- Women at every event, men everywhere except the Grand Slams
Best of
5
- Sets to win
- 3
- Fewest games to win
- 18
- Fewest points to win
- 72
- Most sets, with tiebreaks
- 5 sets, 65 games
- Who plays it
- Men at the four Grand Slams
Minimums counted by our scoring engine: a 6-0 win in every set, every game won to love. Longest case: every set decided by a tiebreak.
The split only exists at the Grand Slams. On the ATP Tour, men play best of three everywhere outside Melbourne, Paris, London and New York, including the Masters 1000 finals. So the question "why do women play 3 sets" is really a question about four tournaments a year, and about why those four kept a format for men that the rest of the sport dropped.
The scoring inside each set is identical. Both play tiebreaks at six games all, and since the 2022 French Open both have played a ten-point tiebreak at six-all in the deciding set. The difference is how many sets it takes to get there. Our tennis rules guide steps through the scoring point by point.

Reasons
Why do women play 3 sets in tennis?
In shortThere is no rule that says women cannot play five sets. Best of three is a tradition from the amateur era that the Grand Slams never changed, and scheduling now keeps it in place.
The honest answer is that nobody decided it in a meeting. Women's tennis grew up in the late 19th century, when it was widely assumed that women could not or should not play long matches, and best of three became the standard for women at most events. The men's championships kept best of five, and the Grand Slams inherited both formats when the Open Era began in 1968.
The arguments for keeping it today are practical. A Grand Slam has a 128-player singles draw for men and another for women, and in the first week there are dozens of matches a day across the outside courts. Best of five for both would add hours of play per day to a schedule that already runs late into the night when rain or long matches pile up. Television schedules lean on the same fact. A women's match fits a predictable slot, a men's five-setter does not.
The arguments against are about fairness and visibility. Critics point out that equal prize money for fewer sets hands opponents of equal pay an easy talking point, and that women never get the chance to play the epic five-set matches that make men's careers. Supporters of best of three answer that the length of a match says nothing about its quality, and that many fans would rather see men play less, not women more.
Physiology is sometimes cited, but no tennis body uses it as the reason. Women run marathons and play long matches; the 1990 season-ending final between Monica Seles and Gabriela Sabatini lasted 3 hours and 47 minutes over five sets.
History
When women played best of five
In shortWomen played five-set matches at the U.S. National Championships until 1901, and the final of the WTA's season-ending championships was best of five from 1984 to 1998.
- 1901
Last five-setter for nearly 90 years
The U.S. National Championships, forerunner of the US Open, staged the last women’s five-set match until 1990.
- 1968
The Open Era begins
Professionals join the Grand Slams. Men keep best of five at the majors, women keep best of three.
- 1984
A five-set final for women
The final of the WTA’s season-ending championships becomes best of five, the only women’s match in the sport with that format.
- 1990
Seles beats Sabatini in five
Monica Seles wins 6-4, 5-7, 3-6, 6-4, 6-2 in 3 hours and 47 minutes, the first women’s five-setter since 1901.
- 1995-96
Graf goes the distance twice
Steffi Graf wins five-set finals against Anke Huber in 1995 and Martina Hingis in 1996.
- 1999
Back to best of three
After the 1998 edition the final returns to best of three, where it remained as of October 22, 2026.
Fifteen years of five-set finals produced three that went the full distance. That small sample is often quoted on both sides of the argument: as proof that women can play long, high-quality matches, and as a sign that most best-of-five women's finals were decided in three or four sets anyway, which is also true of most men's Grand Slam matches.

Match length
How long best-of-five and best-of-three matches last
In shortBest of five is longer on average, but the record books are untidy. The longest women's match ever, over two sets, lasted longer than any Grand Slam final.
- John Isner d. Nicolas MahutWimbledon 2010, first round, five sets 11h 05m
- Vicki Nelson d. Jean HepnerRichmond 1984, first round, two sets 6h 31m
- Novak Djokovic d. Rafael NadalAustralian Open 2012 final, five sets 5h 53m
- Carlos Alcaraz d. Jannik SinnerRoland Garros 2025 final, five sets 5h 29m
- Monica Seles d. Gabriela SabatiniSeason-ending championships 1990, final, five sets 3h 47m
best of five best of three
The extreme case is John Isner against Nicolas Mahut at Wimbledon in 2010: 11 hours and 5 minutes over three days, with a fifth set of 70-68, which is why the Grand Slams now end deciding sets with a tiebreak. The longest Grand Slam final, Novak Djokovic against Rafael Nadal at the 2012 Australian Open, took 5 hours and 53 minutes, and the 2025 Roland Garros final between Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner took 5 hours and 29 minutes.
The odd one out is a best-of-three match. At Richmond in 1984, Vicki Nelson beat Jean Hepner 6-4, 7-6 in 6 hours and 31 minutes, including a single rally of 643 shots that lasted 29 minutes. Two sets, and longer than any Grand Slam final ever played.

Debate
The best-of-5 debate
In shortIn February 2026 Craig Tiley said women should play best of five at the Grand Slams, from the quarterfinals on. Aryna Sabalenka liked the idea; most other top players did not. As of October 22, 2026, no Slam has changed its format.
The proposal came from Craig Tiley, who ran the Australian Open for years before being named chief executive of the USTA in late February 2026. "I think there should be three out of five sets for women," he told the Australian Associated Press, arguing that interest in a match grows the longer it goes. His version would keep best of three in the first week and switch to five sets from the quarterfinals.
The players answered at Indian Wells in March, and Reuters found them divided. "I feel like I would have probably more Grand Slams," said Aryna Sabalenka, the most enthusiastic. Iga Swiatek called it "a weird approach in a world where everything is becoming faster" and doubted the quality would hold over five sets. Coco Gauff objected to the mid-tournament switch: "I think changing the format in the middle of the tournament defeats the purpose of the playing field." Elena Rybakina was blunter: "I wouldn't want to play three out of five, to be honest." Jessica Pegula said she was not a fan of best of five even for men.
That last view has a long history. At the 2018 WTA Finals launch in Singapore, Billie Jean King said: "Personally, I don't want the men playing five sets anymore. I think it takes too much out of them." The two ways to close the gap, women up to five or men down to three, have supporters, and neither had a Grand Slam behind it as of October 22, 2026.
Prize money
Equal prize money and the three-set question
In shortAs of October 22, 2026, all four Grand Slams pay men and women the same per round. The US Open was first, in 1973; Wimbledon and Roland Garros followed in 2007.
Equal pay and the number of sets are separate decisions, and the Slams have treated them that way. The US Open announced equal prize money in 1973; the other majors followed, with Wimbledon and Roland Garros the last, in 2007. Prize money is paid for the round reached, so a women's champion and a men's champion receive the same cheque whether the final lasted 90 minutes or five hours. The current figures are in the tennis prize money guide.
The objection that women are paid the same for "less work" comes up every year. It ignores the many men's matches that end in three quick sets, but it is one reason the best-of-five idea keeps coming back, because matching formats would take that argument off the table for good.
The number of sets is one of the few places where the rulebook treats the two draws differently. The service rules, including the foot fault, and the conduct code behind every code violation apply to men and women in exactly the same way.
FAQ
Why women play three sets: questions and answers
In shortShort answers on best of three, best of five and the Grand Slam formats.
Why do women play 3 sets in tennis instead of 5?
Because women's tennis has used best of three for nearly all of its history, and the Grand Slams have never changed it. The usual explanations are tradition from the amateur era, when women were assumed to need shorter matches, and the practical problem that best of five would need much more court time across a 128-player draw.
Do women play best of 5 at Grand Slams?
No. At all four Grand Slams women's singles matches are best of three sets and men's singles matches best of five. In the final set of both, a ten-point tiebreak is played at six games all.
Have women ever played best of five sets?
Yes. The final of the WTA's season-ending championships was best of five from 1984 to 1998, and three of those finals went the distance. Before that, women had played five-set matches at the U.S. National Championships until 1901.
Should men''s tennis be 3 sets?
Some people in the game think so. Billie Jean King said in 2018 that she did not want men playing five sets anymore because it takes too much out of them. Men already play best of three at every event except the Grand Slams.
Do women get equal prize money if they play fewer sets?
Yes. As of October 22, 2026, all four Grand Slams pay men and women the same per round. The US Open started in 1973, and Wimbledon and Roland Garros were the last to follow, in 2007. Equal pay is set per round reached, not per set played.
Who wants women to play best of 5?
In 2026 Craig Tiley, the long-time Australian Open director who became USTA chief executive, backed best of five for women from the quarterfinals. Aryna Sabalenka welcomed the idea; Iga Swiatek, Coco Gauff, Elena Rybakina and Jessica Pegula were sceptical.
What was the last five-set women''s match?
The last best-of-five women's final at the WTA season finale was in 1998. The last one to go to a fifth set was Steffi Graf's win over Martina Hingis in 1996.
Is a best-of-three match shorter?
Usually, but not always. The longest women's match on record, Vicki Nelson against Jean Hepner at Richmond in 1984, lasted 6 hours and 31 minutes over just two sets, longer than any Grand Slam final.